Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 23:17:35 GMT -5
Importantly, given our "incorruptible" times, the threat of closing the site under the pretext of fighting extremism will become, I think, another means of pressure, another corruption-capable mechanism. "SP": - What do you mean? - The mass media are increasingly going online, and the site's failure to function is a huge problem for them. About the mass media law, which provides for a court procedure to close the site? - These amendments bring the situation out of the legal field into the extrajudicial, administrative sphere. The appointment of administrative repression does not presuppose the presence of a court decision. "SP": - Let's return to the example. The site was blocked for a month. During this time, advertisers ran away, he lost part of his audience. Will it be possible to recover the damages incurred from the state, if it urns out that the site is not extremist? - I suspect you can try.
And in 1928, they took the famous 58 articles and 10 capital France Phone Number such warnings, from such closed structures, will not be the same means of "machine milking" - like traffic rules on the country's roads? If you look at the corruption capacity of administrative repression, it is quite large. Then, who can guarantee you against ordering competitors? Since this is an out-of-court procedure, such threats can be successfully played. This kind of administrative repression is dangerous. In the countries of Africa, Latin America, or where you and I are, it can turn into another banal feeder. Another opinion Yevhen Ikhlov, head of the information and analytical service of the "For Human Rights" movement: - This has already happened in the history of Russia. After the revolution, there was so-called "revolutionary legality" - the opposition was jailed, shot, expelled, but it was, as it were, improvisation - by temporary decrees, resolutions. crimes, the most terrible of which was "Counter-revolutionary Trotskyist activity."
About the results of financial ng to experts, the $100 million budget looks quite realistic. It is possible that an administrative recause it's more human," another journalist notes. That is, it is not a matter of a social network, but of friends, Now the same thing is happening - they codify everything that was before. FSB tightens the nuts In addition to the right to issue warnings, the FSB seems to be trying to greatly expand the scope of the state secrets law. A few days ago, reports appeared in the mass media about amendments to the law "On State Secrets" (experts believe that the amendments were also prepared by the FSB, although they are introduced by the government). These amendments provide for the inclusion in the list of classified information of information "about the forms, methods and conditions of organizing and planning terrorist activities",
And in 1928, they took the famous 58 articles and 10 capital France Phone Number such warnings, from such closed structures, will not be the same means of "machine milking" - like traffic rules on the country's roads? If you look at the corruption capacity of administrative repression, it is quite large. Then, who can guarantee you against ordering competitors? Since this is an out-of-court procedure, such threats can be successfully played. This kind of administrative repression is dangerous. In the countries of Africa, Latin America, or where you and I are, it can turn into another banal feeder. Another opinion Yevhen Ikhlov, head of the information and analytical service of the "For Human Rights" movement: - This has already happened in the history of Russia. After the revolution, there was so-called "revolutionary legality" - the opposition was jailed, shot, expelled, but it was, as it were, improvisation - by temporary decrees, resolutions. crimes, the most terrible of which was "Counter-revolutionary Trotskyist activity."
About the results of financial ng to experts, the $100 million budget looks quite realistic. It is possible that an administrative recause it's more human," another journalist notes. That is, it is not a matter of a social network, but of friends, Now the same thing is happening - they codify everything that was before. FSB tightens the nuts In addition to the right to issue warnings, the FSB seems to be trying to greatly expand the scope of the state secrets law. A few days ago, reports appeared in the mass media about amendments to the law "On State Secrets" (experts believe that the amendments were also prepared by the FSB, although they are introduced by the government). These amendments provide for the inclusion in the list of classified information of information "about the forms, methods and conditions of organizing and planning terrorist activities",